 
          Ó{ÊU "
        
        
          
            &
          
        
        
          
            ENERGY
          
        
        
          N@K? JK8K< 8><E:@<J @E D8JJ8:?LJ<KKJ#
        
        
          NewYork and other states introducing plans
        
        
          to expand natural gas infrastructure and
        
        
          convert customers to natural gas heating,
        
        
          Oilheat associations are pulling out all the
        
        
          stops to defend their member companies.
        
        
          In Massachusetts, the state Department
        
        
          of Energy Resources (DOER) last year
        
        
          launched a study of possible natural gas
        
        
          expansion as a way to help the state comply
        
        
          with the Global Warming Solutions Act
        
        
          that the state enacted in 2008. That law
        
        
          requires the state to reduce greenhouse gas
        
        
          emissions by 25 percent from 1990 levels
        
        
          by 2025 and by 80 percent by 2050.
        
        
          As a stakeholder in the process, the
        
        
          Massachusetts Energy Marketers Asso-
        
        
          ciation filed a report with the DOER in
        
        
          December that was prepared by Richard
        
        
          Sweetser, of Exergy Partners.
        
        
          The report lays out a scientific case
        
        
          for Oilheat, explaining how it benefits
        
        
          consumers and the environment at least as
        
        
          much as natural gas. Here is a look at some
        
        
          of the report’s key findings.
        
        
          :FEM<IJ@FE :FJKJ
        
        
          The report points out that switching
        
        
          a home from an oil-fired boiler to a gas
        
        
          boiler is a costly proposition that involves
        
        
          boiler replacement; chimney replacement
        
        
          or relining; a gas main; service line exten-
        
        
          sion and meter set; gas water heater; and
        
        
          removal and disposal of the fuel storage
        
        
          tank. The report estimates conversion costs
        
        
          at $18,783
        
        
          
            (see table below).
          
        
        
          The report evaluates the relative heating
        
        
          expenses in identical homes using oil and
        
        
          gas and concludes that gas heating requires
        
        
          more energy per BTU than oil heating in
        
        
          non-condensing appliances because of the
        
        
          higher hydrogen content in gas.
        
        
          A condensing gas boiler would offer
        
        
          higher AFUE efficiency than a non-
        
        
          condensing oil unit, the report states, but
        
        
          condensing boilers are unsuitable for many
        
        
          Massachusetts homes. That’s because most
        
        
          existing residential hydronic loops were
        
        
          designed based on high return water tem-
        
        
          peratures and do not allow for condensing
        
        
          during most operating conditions.
        
        
          The report introduces the concept
        
        
          of an “economic indifference curve” to
        
        
          illustrate that even with today’s reduced
        
        
          natural gas prices, most consumers would
        
        
          be indifferent to the prospect of swapping
        
        
          out a non-condensing oil system for a non-
        
        
          condensing gas system, due to inadequate
        
        
          financial reward.
        
        
          The report also cites statements from
        
        
          Oilheat customers who were surveyed by
        
        
          Sussex Energy Advisors, the contractor
        
        
          who drafted DOER’s preliminary gas expan-
        
        
          sion report. The following are four of the
        
        
          customer comments:
        
        
          
            “Unless there is some incentive
          
        
        
          
            that can pay it back in 2-3
          
        
        
          
            years, forget it.”
          
        
        
          
            “My formula is this. If it’s paid
          
        
        
          
            back in savings in 5 years or
          
        
        
          
            less and cost less than $15,000,
          
        
        
          
            then I will deal with it.”
          
        
        
          
            “If you really save me 50% on my
          
        
        
          
            energy bill and it cost less than
          
        
        
          
            $10,000, it will be worth it.”
          
        
        
          
            “I had my furnace replaced in my other
          
        
        
          
            house when they brought gas to my
          
        
        
          
            neighborhood. What a mess. It was late
          
        
        
          
            spring. My yard was ripped up, mud
          
        
        
          
            all over the house from the workers,
          
        
        
          
            they had to cut up my old oil tank, days
          
        
        
          
            of cleaning up after they left. In the end
          
        
        
          
            it was well worth it, but what a mess.”
          
        
        
          Fifty-four percent of the consumers
        
        
          surveyed by Sussex rated fuel conversion as
        
        
          very difficult or somewhat difficult. “This
        
        
          means that the economic indifference curve
        
        
          must be viewed with a bias toward not con-
        
        
          verting,” the Exergy report states.
        
        
          =LKLI< E8KLI8C >8J GI@:<J
        
        
          The Exergy report goes on to examine
        
        
          the notion that today’s relatively low natural
        
        
          gas prices will be sustained over time. Since
        
        
          2003 when the U.S. Energy Information
        
        
          Administration (EIA) began projecting
        
        
          prices out to the year 2025, there has been
        
        
          a significant turnaround in the agency’s
        
        
          projections.
        
        
          Between 2003 and 2009, EIA’s estimate
        
        
          of the 2025 natural gas price increased by
        
        
          56 percent, and by 2013 the projection had
        
        
          returned back to the same level projected
        
        
          in 2003. This indicates a low correlation
        
        
          between projections and actual prices, the
        
        
          report states.
        
        
          Low natural gas prices that have
        
        
          occurred in recent years have led to more
        
        
          natural gas use for power generation and
        
        
          the development of export facilities to send
        
        
          natural gas overseas, where prices are much
        
        
          higher. The report predicts that natural gas
        
        
          prices will climb as a result.
        
        
          :fjk <jk`dXk\j
        
        
          E\n >Xj 9f`c\i
        
        
          /#'''
        
        
          KXeb I\dfmXc I\d\[`Xk`fe
        
        
          ,''
        
        
          :_`de\p Lg^iX[\j
        
        
          (#,''
        
        
          @e ?flj\ >Xj G`g`e^
        
        
          )#'''
        
        
          ;?N @e[`i\Zk ?N KXeb
        
        
          )#,''
        
        
          >Xj J\im`Z\ C`e\ Xe[ D\k\i J\k
        
        
          +#)/*
        
        
          KfkXc :fem\ij`fe :fjk
        
        
          (/#./*
        
        
          F`c kf EXkliXc >Xj :fem\ij`fej :fjk <jk`dXk\j
        
        
          DXb`e^ k_\
        
        
          :Xj\ ]fi F`c_\Xk
        
        
          
            Associations file reports
          
        
        
          
            refuting the value of
          
        
        
          
            fuel conversion
          
        
        
          ivi`}Ê"
i>Ì